Superleaders: Impact on Team Autonomy, Performance & Transformational Leadership Cultures

Photographer: Karin Benedict

Rose-Marie Boylan BSc. Master's Leadership Studies

"The ability to deal with people is as purchaseable a commodity as sugar or coffee, and I will pay more for that ability than any other under the sun."

John D. Rockefeller

Introduction

In today's fast-paced world, the term "superleaders" has begun to resonate within organizational leadership conversations. Superleaders are transformational leaders who inspire their teams and cultivate autonomy, which in turn leads to improved performance. This article explores how superleaders foster environments of independence and high achievement among team members. We will also discuss how the attributes of superleaders including idealized influence, inspirational motivation, and intellectual stimulation, contribute to creating positive workplace cultures.

Superleaders are the pearl in the oyster

Unquestionably the teams superleaders lead outperform other teams by creating self-governed teams, meaningfulness, high-performance, inspirational motivation, learning environments that foster growth & development. More importantly, they create drive and purpose through intellectual stimulation, achivement-orientation vs. competitiveness between team members and individual self-actualization leading to higher team performance outcomes. Leaders and managers that create competition between team members cap the level of performance the team can attain leading to a ceiling on performance outcomes. Sadly, this is the majority of managers and leaders who believe that creating competition in a team between team members drives results. That is in fact incorrect. Inter-competition between team mates limits the long-term potential and puts a ceiling on the highest level of performance that would otherwise be achieved if team members were not competing. Individual members cannot self-actualize if they compete as it lowers individual intelligence, innovation and productivity. This lowers collective team self-actualization, innovation and performance output.

Understanding Superleaders

Superleaders are unique because they embody qualities that inspire and motivate their teams. According to research by Bass and Avolio (1994), transformational leadership includes four essential components, these are foundational in superleaders:

1. Idealized Influence: Leaders act as role models and set high ethical standards. This includes the use of genuine charismatic leadership not just charisma.

2. Inspirational Motivation: They share a clear vision for the future, generating enthusiasm for organizational goals.

   
   

3. Intellectual Stimulation: This encourages team members to explore new ideas and challenge the norm.

   
   

4. Individualized Consideration: Superleaders take the time to mentor team members, fostering personal and professional growth.

   
   

For example, a superleader might hold one-on-one meetings with team members to discuss their career aspirations and provide tailored feedback. This level of engagement encourages employees to take initiative and feel a stronger connection to their work. A superleader also uses advanced coaching skills. Coaching and the positive psychology of coaching skills are necessary for finding what is right in individuals and capitalizing on their strengths to drive results. Many managers feel empowered and get puffed up by focussing on what is wrong in their employees draining employee motivation and productivity.

Unlike traditional leaders, superleaders focus on building relationships rather than exerting control. This fosters a culture of empowerment, where team members feel that their contributions matter, leading to more innovation and commitment to their roles.

Cultivating Autonomous Teams

Team autonomy represents the freedom and independence team members have in their roles. Superleaders foster an environment conducive to autonomy by using transformational leadership skills, as noted by Goleman (1995). They nurture emotional intelligence, which encourages open communication and collaboration.

Research by Druskat and Wolff (2001) shows that teams excel when members feel valued in the decision-making process. For instance, a superleader might implement brainstorming sessions where everyone shares ideas without the fear of criticism. This sense of ownership enhances creativity, which can boost overall team performance by up to 35%.

Most leaders and managers say they empower their followers but when push comes to shove, they do not share power. Few leaders and few managers are willing to give up their power to allow an employee to outshine them. They fear their power or authority may be weakened in doing so. It takes someone who is extremely strong with innate power that is unshakeable to be able to share power equitably without feeling threatened as a leader.

Superleaders create an ecosystem where autonomy flourishes. Conversely, traditional leadership & management approaches often create anxious environments that stifle innovation. By encouraging feedback and maintaining openness, superleaders shift team dynamics towards more productive interactions.

Transformational Leadership Skills in Action

The qualities of transformational leadership yield more than just individual development; they enhance team cohesion. Charismatic leadership is vital for creating engaged and motivated teams. A study by Bono and Judge (2003) found that teams led by transformational leaders reported a 20% increase in job satisfaction and commitment to organizational goals.

When leaders exhibit idealized influence, team members see them as role models. This dynamic fosters loyalty and nurtures strong relationships within the team. For example, a superleader who supports a colleague's idea during a meeting encourages a culture of respect and collaboration.

This achievement-oriented culture promotes growth and innovation. When individuals feel safe to explore their potential and contribute positively, team performance improves. An engaged workforce can lead to up to a 30% increase in sales, reflecting how effective leadership directly influences organizational success.

Achievement-Oriented Culture vs. Competitively Oriented Culture

Understanding the difference between achievement-oriented and competitively oriented cultures is crucial. In achievement-oriented cultures, superleaders focus on personal development and collaboration. They foster trust and cooperation, minimizing toxic competition. For instance, an organization that celebrates team successes sees increased morale and motivation, which can lead to a significant rise in productivity.

In contrast, competitive cultures foster fear and anxiety. Under authoritarian leadership, employees may face threats that stifle creativity. Such environments breed resentment and undermine collective success. Research shows that competitive environments result in a 20% drop in employee satisfaction and a decrease in overall productivity.

Superleaders promote achievement-oriented cultures where team members support each other. This kind of environment drives innovation, as individuals feel safe to share ideas and learn from failures, enhancing overall well-being and performance.

The Cost of Authoritarian Leadership

The approach of authoritarian leadership stands in stark contrast to the principles of superleaders. Authoritarian leaders often value control over collaboration, creating oppressive atmospheres. This fear-based culture can result in high employee turnover, which costs organizations an average of 33% of a lost employee's annual salary in recruitment and training.

Research by Skogstad et al. (2007) indicates that teams led by authoritarian figures demonstrate significantly lower morale and performance. Employees often become disengaged and measure their self-worth against the threat of criticism. This leads to a toxic cycle where blame replaces support, causing turmoil and decreased performance.

The negative impact of authoritarian leadership can also affect a company’s bottom line. When team dynamics turn toxic, sales and customer service suffer, and businesses may struggle to maintain a positive brand image.

The Role of Mentorship and Development

To build autonomous and high-performing teams, integrating mentorship and individual development is vital. Superleaders actively mentor their team members, enhancing their capabilities while fostering loyalty. Research by Day et al. (2014) shows that mentorship can bridge gaps between individual aspirations and organizational goals, leading to improved alignment and performance.

For example, a superleader may hold regular skill development workshops, empowering team members to learn and take on new challenges. This approach not only builds skills but also cultivates a sense of belonging within the team.

Superleaders create a secure environment where team members feel safe to take risks. Trust and mutual respect form the backbone of these relationships, leading to more open discussions and innovation.

Final Thoughts

In summary, the role of superleaders in promoting team autonomy and enhancing performance is profound. Through transformational leadership, they create cultures that prioritize innovation, collaboration, and growth. Their ability to inspire and motivate fosters high-performing teams that focus on achievement rather than competition.

In contrast, authoritarian leadership generates toxic environments that stifle performance and satisfaction. Organizations that prioritize transformational leadership will thrive and create workplaces where both individuals and teams can reach their full potential.

As we adapt to the challenges of modern organizational dynamics, fostering superleaders will be key to sustaining success and nurturing a healthy workplace culture.

References:

• Boylan, R.M. (2006-2009). Conflicts and considerations comparing Abraham Maslow's hierarchy of needs to Jane Loevinger's model of ego development for assessing the level of development of a leader. M.A. Leadership Studies (Master's)

  
  

• Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Sage Publications, Inc.

  
  

• Bono, J. E., & Judge, T. A. (2003). Self-concordance at work: Toward understanding the motivational effects of transformational leaders. Academy of Management Journal.

  
  

• Day, D. V., Fleenor, J. W., Atwater, L. E., Sturm, R. E., & McKee, R. A. (2014). Examining the relations between leader and subordinate emotional intelligence and team outcomes. Leadership & Organization Development Journal.

  
  

• Druskat, V. U., & Wolff, S. B. (2001). Building the emotional intelligence of groups. Harvard Business Review.

  
  

• Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ. Bantam Books.

  
  

• Skogstad, A., Einarsen, S., Torsheim, T., Aasland, M. S., & Hetland, H. (2007). The destructiveness of laissez-faire leadership behavior: The role of leader’s emotional intelligence. Leadership & Organization Development Journal.

  
  

• Alexander, C.N., & Langer, E.J. (Eds.). (1990). Higher stages of human development: Perspectives on adult growth. New York: Oxford University Press.

  
  

• Alexander, C.N. Langer, E.J., Newman, R.I., Chandler, H. M., & Davies, J.L. (1989d). Transcendental Meditation, mindfulness, and longevity: An experimental study with the elderly. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 950-964.

  
  

• Alexander, C.N., Rainforth, M.V., & Gelderloos, P. (1991). Transcendental meditation, self- actualization, and psychological health: A conceptual overview and statistical meta- analysis. Journal of Social Behavior and personality, 6(5), 189-247.

  
  

• Alexander, C.N., Heaton, D.P., & Chandler, H.M. (1994). Advanced human development in the Vedic psychology of Maharishi Mahesh Yogi: Theory and research.

  
  

• In M.E. Miller & S. Cook-Greuter (Eds.), Transcendence and mature thought in adulthood (pp.39-70). New York: Rowman & Littlefield. American Psychological Association. (2001). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

  
  

• Areni, C. S., & Burger, M. (2008). Memories of "bad" days are more biased than memories of "good" days: Past Saturdays vary, but past Mondays are always blue. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(6), 1395-1415.

  
  

• Armon, C. (1984) Ideals of the good life and moral judgment: Ethical reasoning across the Lifespan.

  
  

• Assagioli, R. (1984). Psychosynthesis, Penguin Books, New York.

  
  

• Ausubel, D. P. (1965). Ego development and the personality disorders; A developmental approach to psychopathology. New York: Grune & Stratton.

  
  

• Ausubel, D. P. (1996). Ego development and psychopathology. New Brunswick, N.J., U.S.A.: Transaction Publishers.

  
  

• Avolio, B. J. (1999). Full leadership development: Building the vital forces in organizations. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.

  
  

• Avolio, B. J. (2005). Leadership development in balance : Made. Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum.

  
  

• Avolio, B. J., & Luthans, F. (2006). High impact leader: Moments matter in accelerating authentic leadership development. New York: McGraw Hill.

  
  

• Banathy, B. (1996). Designing social systems in a changing world, Plenum Press, New York.

  
  

• Banathy, B. (2000). Guiding evolution of society: A systems view, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.

  
  

• Bandura, A., & Jourden, F.J. (1991). Self-regulatory mechanisms governing the impact of social comparison on complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 941-951.

  
  

• Barr, H. L., & Langs, Robert J. Joint author. (19 uu). LSD: Personality and experience [by] Harriet Linton Barr, Robert J. Langs, and Robert R. Holt, Leo Goldberger [and] George S. Klein. New York: Wiley-Interscience [c1972].

  
  

• Bass, B. M. (1960). Leadership, psychology, and organizational behavior. New York: Harper Row.

  
  

• Bass, B. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.

  
  

• Baumeister, R. F., Heatherton, T. F., & Tice, D. M. (1994). Losing control: How and why people fail at self-regulation. San Diego: Academic Press.

  
  

• Blatt, M. (1969). The effects of classroom discussion on the development of moral judgment (Ph.D diss. University of Chicago).method in personality assessment and psychiatric research. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. (Original work published 1961).

  
  

• Block, J. (1978). The Q-sort method in personality assessment and psychiatric research. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. (Original work published 1961).

  
  

• Block, J.H., & Block, J. (1980). The role of ego-control and ego-resilience in the organization of behavior. In W.A. Collins (Ed.), The Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology (Vol.13, pp.39-101.

  
  

• Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Block, J. (1982). Assimilation, accommodation, and the dynamics of personality development. Child Development, 53, 281-295.

  
  

• Bogost, I. (2007). Persuasive games: The expressive power of videogames, MIT Press, Boston. Bowes, P. (19 uu). Consciousness and freedom: Three views. London: Methuen. Brach, J. (19uu). Conscience et connaissance; étude sur les êtres artificiels, les animaux et les humains. Paris: M. Rivière.

  
  

• Broad, C. D. (19uu). Mind and its place in nature. London: Routledge & K. Paul [1951.

• Brotherton, C. J. (1999). Social psychology and management : Issues for a changing society.

  
  

• Buckingham, UK; Philadelphia, PA, USA: Open University Press.

  
  

• Brown, K. & Ryan, R. (2003). The benefits of being present: The role of mindfulness in psychological wellbeing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 822-848.

• Browning, D.L. (1983). Aspects of authoritarian attitudes in ego development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 137-144.

  
  

• Bugental, J. Maslow, Abraham Harold [electronic version] Burrow, T. (19 uu). Social basis of consciousness; a study in organic psychology based upon a synthetic and societal concept of the neuroses. New York: Harcourt, Brace.

  
  

• Bushe, G.R., Gibbs B.W. (1990). Predicting organization development consulting competence from Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and stage of ego development. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 26, (3), 337-357.

  
  

• Bushe, G. R., & Coetzer, G. (1995). Appreciate inquiry as a team-development intervention: A controlled experiment. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 31(1), 13-30.

• Bushe, G. R., & Gibbs, B. W. (1990). Predicting organization development consulting competence from the Myers-Briggs type indicator and stage of ego development. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 26(3), 337-357.

  
  

• Butler, G., & Hope, T. (1995). Managing your mind: The mental fitness guide. New York: Oxford University Press. Carter, L., Ulrich, D., & Goldsmith, M. (2005). Best practices in leadership development and organization change how the best companies ensure meaningful change and sustainable leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  
  

• Cassel, R. N. E., & Heichberger, R. L. E. (19uu). Leadership development: Theory and practice, edited by Russell N. Cassel and Robert L. Heichberger. North Quincy: Mass., Christopher.

  
  

• Cassel, R. N., & Heichberger, R. L. (1975). Leadership development: Theory and practice. North Quincy, Mass.: Christopher Pub. House.

  
  

• Cayer, M., & Marchand, M. (2002). Developing transformational leadership through mindfulness. Proceedings of the 4th annual of the National Business and Economic Society.

  
  

• Cayer, M., Baron, C. (2006). Developper un leadership postconventionnel par une formation a la presence attentive. Developing postconventional leadership through a mindfulness training program. Revue Quebecoise de Psychologie, 27(1), pp. 257-271.

  
  

• Chandler, H.M., “Transcendental Meditation and awakening wisdom: a ten-year longitudinal study of self-development” Dissertation Abstract International 1991.

  
  

• Coghlan, D. (2008). Authenticity as first person practice: An exploration based on bernard lonergan. Action Research, 6(3), 351-366.

  
  

• Colley, L. A. (1966). Relation of re-creation to a theory of ego development. [Madison, Wis: s.n.].

  
  

• Commons M.L., Armon,C. Kohlberg, L. Richards, F.A., Grotzer T.A. & Sinnott, J.D. (Eds). Adult Development: Models and Methods in the study of adolescent and adult thought volume 2. New York: Praeger.

  
  

• Commons M.L., Bandura, F.A., Jourden, F.J. (1991). Self-regulatory mechanisms governing the impact of social comparison on complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 941-951.

  
  

• Commons, M. L., & Bresette, L. M. (. (2006). Illuminating major creative scientific innovators with postformal stages. New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press.

  
  

• Commons, M. L., Krause, S. R., Fayer, G. A., & Meaney, M. (1993). Atmosphere and stage development in the workplace. Hillsdale, NJ, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Community leadership development: Implications for extension (1986).  University Park, PA: Northeast Regional Center for Rural Development.

  
  

• Conner, D.R. (1992).Managing at the speed of change: How resilient managers succeed and prosper where others fail. New York: Villard Books.

  
  

• Conley, C. (2007). Peak: How great companies get their mojo from Maslow (1st ed ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  
  

• Cooke, B. Situating Maslow in cold war America: A recontextualization of management theory [electronic version].

  
  

• Cook-Greuter, S. (1990). Maps of living: Ego-development stages from symbiosis to conscious universal embeddedness. In T. G. M. Commons et J. Sinnott (Eds), Adult development, models and methods in the study of adolescent and adult thought (p. 79 104). New York: Praeger.

  
  

• Cook-Greuter S., “Rare forms of self-understanding in mature adults”, in M.E. Miller & S. Cook-Greuter (Eds.), Transcendence and mature thought in adulthood: The further reaches of adult development (pp. 119-147). New York: Rowman and Littlefield.

  
  

• Cook-Greuter, S. (Eds), Transcendence and mature thought in adulthood, Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD, 1994.

  
  

• Cook-Greuter, S. (1999). Post autonomous ego development: A study of its nature and measurement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.

  
  

• Cook-Greuter, S. (1999). Mature ego development: A gateway to ego transcendence? Journal of Adult Development, 7(4), 227-240.

  
  

• Dahl, T., “Creating lasting change: a presidential address” Seventh World Productivity Congress, 19.

  
  

• Dawkins, R. (1978). The selfish gene, Oxford University Press, New York.

  
  

• De Souza, A. (1978). Politics of change and leadership development: The new leaders in India and Africa. New Delhi: Manohar.

  
  

• De Souza, A. (1978). Politics of change and leadership development: The new leaders in India and Africa. Columbia: Mo. South Asia Books [1978]. Demick, J., & Miller, P. M. (1993). Development in the workplace. Hillsdale, NJ, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

  
  

• Demick, J., (Ed.), & Miller, P. M., (Ed.). (1993). Development in the workplace Dent, E. (2005). Spirituality and leadership: An empirical review of definitions, distinctions, and embedded assumptions. The Leadership Quarterly, 16 (5), 625.

  
  

• Derr, C. B.  B., Roussillon, S., & Bournois, F. (2002). Cross-cultural approaches to leadership development. Westport, Conn.; London: Quorum Books. Drath, W. (1993). Why managers have trouble empowering: A theoretical perspective based on concepts of adult development. A Center for Creative Leadership Report.

  
  

• Drucker, P. F., Managing for the Future: The 1990s and beyond, Truman Talley Books New York, NY, 1992.

  
  

• Drucker, P.F., Post-Capitalist Society, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 1994.

  
  

• Earley, P.C.,Northcraft, G.B., Lee, C., & Lituchy, T.R. (1990). Impact of process and outcome feedback on the relation of goal setting to performance. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 87-105. Ecole des hautes études commerciales (Montréal,Québec).

• Pauchant, T. C., & Dumas, C. (1990). Abraham Maslow and Heinz Kohut - a comparison. 1990: Edwards, M. (2005). The integral holon: A holonomic approach to organisational change and transformation. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 18(3), 269.

  
  

• Erez, M., & Zidon, I. (1984). Effects of goal acceptance on the relationship with goal difficulty to performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 69-78.

  
  

• Erikson, E.H., 1950. Childhood and Society. New York: Norton. Erickson, E. (1968). Identity, youth, crises. New York: Norton. Erickson, E. (1970). Ghandi’s truth: On the origins of militant non-violence. New York: Norton.

  
  

• Ewen, R. B. (2003). An introduction to theories of personality (6th ed.). Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. Extension leadership development resources: U.S. and Canada bibliography(1988). University Park, PA: Northeast Regional Rural Development Center, Pennsylvania State University.

  
  

• Fairhurst, G. T. (2007). Discursive leadership: In conversation with leadership psychology. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.

  
  

• Farthing, G. W. (1992). Psychology of consciousness. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.

  
  

• Finkelstein, S. (1992). Power in top management teams: dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 35(3), 505-538.

  
  

• Fisher, D. & Torbert, W. (1991). Transforming managerial practice: Beyond the achiever phase. Research in organizational change and development, 5, 143-173.

  
  

• Fisher, D. & Torbert, W. (2000). Personal and organizational transformations through action inquiry. Boston: EdgeWork Press.

  
  

• Fisk, G.,1922- ed. (19uu). Psychology of management decision. The second symposium of the college on management psychology of the Institute of Management Sciences, Philadelphia. Lund: Gleerup.

  
  

• Fisk, G.,1922- ed. (1964). Frontiers of management psychology. -. New York: Harper & Row.

  
  

• Fitzgerald, C., & Kirby, L. K. (1997). Developing leaders: Research and applications in psychological type and leadership development: Integrating reality and vision, mind and heart (1st ed ed.). Palo Alto, Calif.: Davies-Black Pub.

  
  

• Forman, R. K. C. (1990). Problem of pure consciousness : Mysticism and philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.

  
  

• Freedberg, E. J. (. J. (1997). Activation: The core competency (1st ed ed.). Toronto: Harper Collins Publishers.

  
  

• Frick, W. B., Murphy, G., Rogers, C. R. (. R., & Maslow, A. H. (. H. (1971). Humanistic psychology: Interviews with Maslow, Murphy, and Rogers. Columbus, Ohio: Merrill. 60

  
  

• Frick, W. B., Murphy, G., Rogers, C. R. (. R., & Maslow, A. H. (. H. (19uu). Humanistic psychology: Interviews with Maslow, Murphy, and Rogers [by] Willard B. Frick. Columbus: Ohio.

  
  

• Fromm, E. Escape from freedom. New York: Norton, 1932.

  
  

• Frostig, M., & Maslow, P. (1970). Movement education: Theory and practice. Chicago: Follett Educational Corp.

  
  

• Fulmer, R. M., & Goldsmith, M. (2001). Leadership investment: How the world's best organizations gain strategic advantage through leadership development. New York: AMACOM.

  
  

• Garfield, C. (1996). Peak Performers: The new heroes of American business, Morrow, New York, NY. Gellerman, S. W. (1960). Uses of psychology in management. London: Collier-Macmillan, [1970.

  
  

• Gennaro, R. J. (2004). Higher-order theories of consciousness : An anthology. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Pub.

  
  

• Gibbons, D.E.,& Weingart, L.R. (2001). Can I do it? Will I try? Personal efficacy, assigned goals, and performance norms as motivators of individual performance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(3), 624-648.

  
  

• Giber, D. J., Carter, L., & Goldsmith, M. (2000). Linkage Inc.'s best practices in leadership development handbook : Case studies, instruments, training (1st ed ed.). San Francisco, Calif.: Lexington, MA: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer; Linkage Incorporated.

  
  

• Gilbreth, L. E. M. (1973). Psychology of management : The function of the mind in determining, teaching and installing methods of least waste.

  
  

• Hannum, K., Martineau, J., & Reinelt, C. (2007). Handbook of leadership development evaluation (1st ed ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  
  

• Harris, V. F. (1992). Incorporative consciousness of robert bly. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

  
  

• Harung, H.S., Alexander, C.N., Heaton, D.P., “A unified theory of leadership: experiences of higher states of consciousness in world-leaders”, Leadership and Organization Development Journal 1995 pp. 44-59.

  
  

• Hausdorf, P., (2007). Coaching: Theories & Practice. University of Guelph Faculty of Management. Hauser, S. T. (1976). Loevinger's model and measure of ego development: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 83(5), 928-955.

  
  

• Hauser, S. T., Powers, S. I., & Noam, G. G. (1991). Adolescents and their families : Paths of ego development. New York: Free Press.

  
  

• Hamel, S. Leclerc, G., Lefrancois ??R. (2003). International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, Volume 13, Issue 1 January 2003, pages 3-15.

  
  

• Hamilton, E. (1988). The facilitation of organizational change: An empirical study of factors predicting change agents’ effectiveness. Journal of Applied behavioral Science, 24, 37 59. 62 Harung, H.S. and Heaton, D.P. (May 1993), “Significance of higher stages of adult development for improving the effectiveness of knowledge workers”, Eighth World Productivity Congress, Stockholm, 23-27 May 1993.

  
  

• Harung, H.S. Heaton, D.P. Graff, W.W. and Alexander, C. N. (1996). Peak performance and higher states of consciousness: a study of world-class performers. Journal of Managerial Psychology 11(4), 3-21.

  
  

• Harvey, O.J., Hunt, D.E., & Schroder, H.M. (1961). Conceptual systems and personality organization. New York: Wiley.

  
  

• Helson, R., Mitchell V., & Hart, B. (1985). Lives of women who became autonomous. Journal of Personality, 53(2), 258-285.

  
  

• Helson, R., Srivastava, S. (2001). Three paths to adult development: Conservers, seekers, and achievers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(6), 995-1010.

  
  

• Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., Bloch Snyderman, B. (1959). The motivation to work. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

  
  

• Higgins, E. T (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94(3), 319-340. Hoffman, E. (1988). Right to be human: A biography of abraham maslow. Los Angeles: J.P. Tarcher.

  
  

• Hormozi, F. (1970). Lock means key, New York Times, March 1, 1970.

  
  

• Hormozi, F. (1987). What is it? Farhad Hormozi, Fribourg, Switerzerland.

  
  

• Hoyle, R. H. (1999). Selfhood: Identity, esteem, regulation. Boulder, Colo.: Westview.

  
  

• Huizinga, G. H. (1970). Maslow's need hierarchy in the work situation. Groningen: Wolters Noordhoff Pub.

  
  

• Huizinga, G. (19uu). Maslow's need hierarchy in the work situation. Groningen: Wolters Noordhoff.

  
  

• Hunt, D.E., & Halverson, C. (1964) Manual for scoring sentence completion responses for adolescents. Unpublished manuscript, Syracuse University. 63

  
  

• Hunter, R. (1971). Storming of the mind. Garden City: N.Y., Doubleday. Hy, L.X., & Loevinger, J. (1996). Measuring ego development (2nd ed.).

  
  

• Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum. Innis, R. E. (1994). Consciousness and the play of signs. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. International Institute for Sustainable Development. (1992). Business strategy for sustainable development : Leadership and accountability for the '90s. Iowa State University. North Central Regional Center for Rural Development, Vandenberg, L., Fear, F. A., & Thullen, M. (1988). Research-practice linkages in extension leadership development programs: Focus on community leadership development programs. 1988: Irby, L. (2006). Leadership voices : Neutralizing bullies, determinedly difficult people, and predators at work.

  
  

• Lanham, MD: Hamilton Books. Isaacs, K.S. Relatability, a proposed construct and an approach towards its validation. Doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago, 1956.

  
  

• Janis, I.L. & Mann, L. (1977). Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice and commitment. New York: The Free Press.

  
  

• Jahn, R. G., & Dunne, B. J. (1987). Margins of reality: The role of consciousness in the physical world (lst ed. - ed.). San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. Jenkins, J. C., & Jenkins, M. R. (2006). 9 disciplines of a facilitator: Leading groups by transforming yourself (1st ed ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, A John Wiley & Sons Imprint.

  
  

• Johnson, D. (2008). Teaching: Professionalization, development and leadership festschrift for professor Eric Hoyle. Dordrecht: Springer.

  
  

• Kaplan, B.,1925- ed., & Wapner, S. (1960). Perspectives in psychological theory; essays in honor of heinz werner. New York: International Universities Press.

  
  

• Kegan, R. (1982). Evolving self: Problem and process in human development. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. 64

  
  

• Kegan, R. (1994). In over our heads: The mental demands of modern life. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

  
  

• Kegan, R., & Lahey, L. L. (2001). How the way we talk can change the way we work: Seven languages for transformation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  
  

• Kegan R. & Lahey, L.L. The real reason people won’t change. Harvard Business Review, November, 2001. p. 85-92.

  
  

• Kegan, R., Lahey, L. & Souvaine, E. (1998). From taxonomy to ontogeny: Thoughts on Loevinger’s theory in relation to subject-object psychology. In P.M.

  
  

• Westenberg, A. Blasi, & L.D. Lawrence (Eds), Personality development: Theoretical, empirical, and clinical investigations of Loevinger’s conception of ego development (pp. 39-58).

  
  

• Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Kets de Vries, M. (2006). The leader on the couch: a clinical approach to changing people and organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  King, L., A. (2001). The hard road to the good life: The happy, mature person. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 41(1), 51-72.

  
  

• Kirk, R. (1994). Raw feeling: A philosophical account of the essence of consciousness. Oxford : New York: Clarendon Press ; Oxford University Press.

  
  

• Klein, G. S., Gill, M. M.  & Holzman, P. S. (1976). Psychology versus metapsychology: Psychoanalytic essays in memory of George S. Klein. New York: International Universities Press.

  
  

• Klein, H. J. (1991). Further evidence on the relationship between goal setting and expectancy theories. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 49, 230-257.

  
  

• Klisanin, D. (2003). Designing media with intent: Evolutionary guidance media for the creation of planetary consciousness. (Doctoral dissertation, Saybrook Graduate School and Research Center, 2003) Dissertation Abstracts International 64(08), 2691.

  
  

• Klisanin, D. (2005). Transpersonal Artistry: Designing evolutionary guidance media, The Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 37(1): 52-77). Klisanin, D. (2007). Applying Banathy’s Design of Evolutionary Guidance Systems to media: A protégée’s experience, Systemist. 29(3): 83-90. 65 Kofta, M., Weary, G., & Sedek, G. (1998). Personal control in action: Cognitive and motivational mechanisms. New York; London: Plenum Press. KoltKo-Rivera, M.E. (2006). Rediscovering the latest version of Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs: Self-transcendence and opportunities for theory, research, and unification, Review of Generational Psychology. 10 (4), 302-317.

  
  

• Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive developmental approach to socialization. In D.A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 348-480). Chicago: Rand McNally. Kravis-De Roulet Leadership Conference (11th : 2001: Claremont McKenna College), Murphy, S. E., & Riggio, R. E. (2003). Future of leadership development.

  
  

• Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Kris, E. (1952). The psychology of caricature. Psychoanalytic explorations in art. New York: International Universities Press. Kuhnert, K. W. & Lewis P. (1987). Transactional and transformational leadership: A constructive/developmental analysis. Academy of Management Review, 12, 4, 648-657.

  
  

• Laird, D. A., & Laird, Eleanor Childs (Leonard), joint author. (19uu). New psychology for leadership, based on researches in group dynamics and human relations, by Donald A. Laird and Eleanor C. Laird. New York: McGraw-Hill [1956].

  
  

• Langley, M. H. (1994). Self-management therapy for borderline personality disorder: A therapist-guided approach. New York: Springer Pub. Co.

  
  

• Latham, G. P., & Baldes, J. J. (1975). The practical significance of Locke's theory of goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 122-124.

  
  

• Latham, G.P.,Erez, M., & Locke, E.A. (1988). Resolving scientific disputes by the joint design of crucial experiments by the antagonists: Application to the Erez-Latham dispute regarding participation in goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(4), 753-772.

  
  

• Latham, G.P.,& Locke, E.A. (1991). Self-regulation through goal setting. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 212-247. 66 Leadership development programs and practices, future directions, examples and models: A report (1998). New York: American Management Association. Levinson, D.J. (1978). Season’s of a man’s life. New York: Balantine Books. Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science.New York: Harper and Row.

  
  

• Litrell, J.H.,&Girvin, H. (2002). Stages of change: A critique. Behavior Modification, 26(2), 223-273.

  
  

• Locke, E.A.,& Latham, G.P. (1984). Goal Setting: A motivational technique that works. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

  
  

• Loevinger, J., Wessler R., Redmore, C. Measuring ego development: scoring manual for women and girls. Jossey-Bass Inc., San Francisco, CA, 1970.

  
  

• Loevinger J. Recent research on ego development. Address to the Society for Research in Child Development, Philadelphia, March 31, 1973.

  
  

• Loevinger, J., Ego Development: Conceptions and Theories, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, 1976.

  
  

• Loevinger, J., The meaning and measurement of ego development. American psychologist, 1966, 21, 195-206.

  
  

• Loevinger, J. (1978). Scientific ways in the study of ego development. (Worcester, Mass.): Clark University Press, 1978.

  
  

• Loevinger, J. (1998). Technical foundations for measuring ego development: The Washington University Sentence Completion Test.

  
  

• Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum. Loevinger, J. (1998). Technical foundations for measuring ego development : The washington university sentence completion test.

  
  

• Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum. Loevinger, J. (1978). Scientific ways in the study of ego development.: Clark University Press.

  
  

• Loevinger, J. (1987). Paradigms of personality. New York: Freeman.

  
  

• Loevinger, J. (1987). Paradigms of personality. New York: Freeman. 67

  
  

• Loevinger, J., & Blasi, A. (1976). Ego development : [conceptions and theories] (1st ed ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

  
  

• Loevinger, J., & Plasi, A.,joint author. (1976). Ego development: Conceptions and theories, (1st ed. - ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

  
  

• Loevinger, J., & Blasi, A. (1976). Ego development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  
  

• Loevinger, J., Wessler, R. (1970). Measuring ego development (1St Ed.) San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. London, M. (2002). Leadership development: Paths to self-insight and professional growth. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Loye, D. (1977). Leadership passion: (psychology of ideology) (1St Ed). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. Lowry, R.J. (1973). Dominance, self-esteem, self-actulaization: Germinal papers of A.H. Maslow. Monterey, California: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.

  
  

• Mabey, C., & Finch-Lees, T. (2008). Management and leadership development. Los Angeles; London: SAGE.

  
  

• MacIntyre, A. T. (. T., & Stouffer, J. (2007). Strategic leadership development: International perspectives. Winnipeg: Canadian Defence Academy Press.

  
  

• Magoon, R. A., & Jellen, H. (1980). Leadership development: Democracy in action. Poquoson, Va: Human Development Press. Mahesh Yogi, M. (1963). Science of being and art of living. Toronto: The New American Library of Canada.

  
  

• Mahesh Yogi, M. (1969). Maharishi Mahesh Yogi on the Bhagavad-Gita: A new translation and commentary with Sanskrit text. Australia: Penguin Books.

  
  

• Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, Creating an Ideal Society: A Global Undertaking, MERU Press, Rheinweiler, (1976). Manners, J., & Durkin, K. (2000). Processes involved in adult ego development: A conceptual framework. Development Review, 20, 475-513. 68

  
  

• Manners, J., & Durkin, K., (2001). A critical review of the validity of ego development theory and its measurement. Journal of Personality Assessment, 77(3), 541-567.

  
  

• Manners, J., & Durkin, K., & Nesdale, A. (2004). Promoting advanced ego development among adults. Journal of Adult Development, 11(1), 19-28.

  
  

• Marshall, J. C., & McHardy, B. (1999). Principles of self-management : The key to personal and professional success. Toronto: Self Management Group.

  
  

• Martineau, J., & Hannum, K. (2004). Evaluating the impact of leadership development : A professional guide. Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.

  
  

• Maslow, A.H. (1936). The role of dominance in the social and sexual behavior of infra-human primates: I. Observations. The Journal of Genetic Psychology (48), 261-277.

  
  

• Maslow, A.H. (1937). Dominance-Feeling, behavior, and status. Psychological Review (44), 404-429.

  
  

• Maslow, A.H. (1939). Dominance, personality, and social behavior in women. Journal of Social Psychology, (10), 3-39.