Intractable conflict & negotiation planning

Intractable vs. tractable conflict

R.M. Boylan

Definitions

Depending on what stage you are at with the other party you need to analyze the conflict and the spectrum of threat in the relationship and characters at the table. Every character and option represents a potential financial upside or downside. In a worst case scenario when dealing with trade wars and peace treaties it may involve wars which escalate to armed conflict or destruction through economic or technological interference.

Examples of intractable conflicts may include the Russia-Ukraine dispute, the trade war between Canada and the US, and the debate over Canada's right to maintain its sovereignty. Another less obvious, but still intractable conflict is the current stance of the Pharmaceutical Industry with Health and Human Services regarding Americans' over-reliance on pharmaceutical drugs.

When disagreements and conflicts are based on deep-rooted belief systems and decision-makers are ready to act at all costs irrespective of harm and damage, the conflict is intractable. The conflict and negotiation strategy must be elevated to include systems thinking, strategic foresight and periphery scanning to manage the threats and losses. Conflicts can always be resolved but generally not within the group that created them.

Intractable conflicts can be resolved if they are addressed early with a plan and strategy. Because leaders and their followers may avoid addressing unpleasant situations or possibilities, procrastination can leave them unprepared for negotiations. This is when the opposing side can take advantage, unless a smart strategy is developed that surprises them and brings the conflict to a negotiation between respected negotiators.

whether you are still bargaining or have moved to negotiating conflict may arise. Specifically, in bargaining scenarios which breed threats, bullying, the use of coercive power, manipulation and trickery to get one's way. Analyzing the conflict is important as it escalates before it becomes intractable. When bargaining turns to stonewalling, the scenario is now turning to a worst case scenario for a negotiation which is an intractable conflict. Understanding the drivers, characters, motivators behind what makes the conflict intractable is key to solving it.

Intractable conflict refers to disputes that are deeply rooted, persistent, and resistant to resolution. As we are seeing sometimes these conflicts are engineered to obtain something of value. These conflicts often involve fundamental issues such as identity, values, resources, or deep-seated grievances, making them difficult to manage or resolve. Examples include ethnic conflicts, territorial disputes, religious conflicts, racial disputes, and long-standing political disagreements. There is a spectrum of hate that escalates the intractability of the conflict.

Tractable conflict, on the other hand, involve issues that are more manageable and can be resolved through dialogue, negotiation, or mediation. These conflicts are usually based on interests that can be addressed through compromise or agreement. Examples include labor disputes or contractual disagreements.

Improving conflict: Resolution, mediation & negotiation

Conflict Resolution

Conflict resolution encompasses a variety of methods aimed at resolving disputes. It often involves identifying the underlying issues and finding solutions that satisfy the needs of all parties involved. Techniques include facilitation, dialogue, and structured problem-solving.

Mediation

Mediation is a specific form of conflict resolution where a neutral third party helps facilitate communication between conflicting parties. The mediator assists in identifying issues, exploring interests, and generating options for resolution. Unlike arbitration, mediation does not impose a solution but encourages parties to reach a mutually acceptable agreement.

Negotiation

Negotiation is a process where parties engage directly to discuss their differences and seek a mutually beneficial outcome. It can be more flexible than mediation and allows for direct communication and bargaining. Negotiation can involve various styles, such as integrative (win-win) or distributive (win-lose).

Comparative Analysis of Approaches

Differences

• Conflict Resolution: Broad approach addressing underlying issues.

• Mediation: Involves a neutral third party facilitating discussions.

• Negotiation: Direct engagement between parties, emphasizing communication and compromise.

  
  

Why Negotiation is a Better Approach

Negotiation is often viewed as a more effective approach to resolving conflicts because it allows for direct communication between the parties involved. This can lead to:

• Greater understanding of each other's perspectives and interests.

• More flexible solutions tailored to the specific needs of both parties.

• Empowerment of the parties to take ownership of the resolution process.

  
  

Bringing Intractable Conflict to Win-Win Negotiation

Transforming intractable conflicts into win-win negotiations requires several key strategies:

• Building Trust: Establishing a foundation of trust is crucial for open dialogue.

• Identifying Common Interests: Focusing on shared goals can help reframe the conflict.

• Creative Problem Solving: Encouraging brainstorming of innovative solutions that satisfy all parties.

• Long-term Commitment: Recognizing that resolution may require ongoing dialogue and adjustments.

  
  

Examples of Great Leaders

Several historical leaders have successfully navigated intractable conflicts through negotiation:

• Nelson Mandela: Successfully negotiated the end of apartheid in South Africa, emphasizing reconciliation and unity.

• Martin Luther King Jr.: Advocated for civil rights through nonviolent negotiation and dialogue, leading to significant legislative changes.

• Winston Churchill: His negotiation strategies during World War II helped unite allies against a common enemy.

  
  

  References

• Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (2011). *Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In*. Penguin Books.

• Deutsch, M. (1973). The Resolution of Conflict: Constructive and Destructive Processes. Yale University Press.

• Bercovitch, J., & Houston, A. (2000). Conflict Resolution in the Twenty-First Century: Principles, Methods, and Approaches*. University of Michigan Press.

• Bazerman, M. H., & Neale, M. A. (1992). Negotiating Rationally. Free Press.

• Deutsch, M. (1973). The Resolution of Conflict: Constructive and Destructive Processes. Yale University Press.

• Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (1991). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. Penguin Books.

• Lewicki, R. J., Barry, B., & Saunders, D. M. (2015). Negotiation. McGraw-Hill Education.

• Thompson, L. (2013). The Mind and Heart of the Negotiator. Pearson.

• Thomas, K. W., & Kilmann, R. H. (1974). Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument. TKI Publications.

• The 7 Elements of the Harvard Negotiation Method | The Training Box

• Boylan, R.M. (2006-2009). Conflicts and considerations comparing Abraham Maslow's

         hierarchy of needs to Jane Loevinger's model of ego development for assessing the level of development of a leader. M.A. Leadership Studies.

• Blair, R. J. R. (2005). "Responding to the Emotions of Others: Dissociating Forms of Empathy through the Study of Antisocial Personality Disorder." Emotion, 5(1), 1-10.

• Braden, G. (2000). The Isaiah Effect. Harmony Books.

• Brunsson, N. (2007). The consequences of decision-making. Oxford University Press.

• Cialdini, R.B. (1993). Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion. Harpers Collins

Publishers.

• Cooper, D. F., & Chapman, C. B. (2005). Risk Management: A Project Management Approach. Taylor & Francis.

• Covey, S. The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People. (1989). Stephen Covey.

• "Dark Triad". Psychology Today United Kingdom. Retrieved July 6, 2022.  First published by Delroy, L. Paulhus and Kevin M. Williams in 2002

• Deutsch, M., Coleman, P.T. (2000). The Handbook of Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice. Jossey-Bass Publishers.

• Fisher, R., Ury, W., & Patton, B. (2011). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. Penguin Books.

• French, J. R. P., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright

       (Ed.), Studies in Social Power (pp. 150-167). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

• Hare, R. D. (1991). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R). Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.

• Harvard Business Review. (2019). On Negotiation. Harvard Business Review Press

• Harvard Negotiation Project https://www.pon.harvard.edu/tag/the-harvard-negotiation-project/

• Hofstede, Geert. (2017). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing values, behaviours, institutions and organizations across nations. A MASCAT Analysis.

• Jung, C.G. (2002). Psychology of the Unconscious. Dodd, Mead & Company.

• Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: "Seizing" and "freezing." Psychological Review, 103(2), 263-283.

• Lewicki, R. J., Barry, B., & Saunders, D. M. (2015). Negotiation (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

• O’Connor, J. & Prior, R. (1995). Successful selling with NLP: Neuro-linguistic programming the way forward in the new bazaar. Harper Collins Publisher.

• Pritchard, C.L. (2001). Risk Management: Concepts and guidance Second edition. ESI International.

• Rackham, N. (1988). SPIN Selling. Situation, Problem, Implication, Need-Payoff. McGraw-Hill  Book Company.

• Raiffa, H. (2002). Negotiation Analysis: The Science and Art of Collaborative Decision Making. Harvard University Press.

• Raine, A. (2002). "Biosocial Studies of Antisocial and Violent Behavior." Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111(1), 1-10.

• Ries, A. Trout, J. (1981). Positioning : The Battle for your mind. Werner Books.

• Salacuse, J.W. (2008). Seven secrets for negotiating with government: How to deal with local, state, national, or foreign governments and come out ahead. AMACOM

• Thompson, L. (2014). The Mind and Heart of the Negotiator (6th ed.). Pearson.

• Ury, W. (1993). Getting Past No: Negotiating Your Way from Confrontation to Cooperation. New York: Bantam Books.

• Weiss, J. (2016). Harvard Business Review Guide to. Negotiating: Take the Lead Manage Conflict Get to Yes. Harvard Business Review Press