Election choices Canada
- R.M. Boylan
- Jan 15
- 3 min read
Wise Choices Canada's Federal Election
Canada finds itself caught in a difficult situation between the Greenland issue and tariff threats from the United States.
For Canadians, particularly women, this will not be an easy decision, whom to vote for. Every choice and candidate carries consequences. It's important to assess the relative risk. I hope to objectively evaluate the candidates based on specific demographic interest groups. I will focus on the pharmaceutical industry, particularly patients and their access to medicines. A Conservative government might have better policies for the industry but worse policies for patients and access. This could mean cutting funding for Medicare and reducing drug reimbursement for the sick. This directly impacts revenue streams and patient lives. Tax offsets do not always compensate for significant revenue losses.
This is a challenging period. Under Justin Trudeau, the left overreached, the left went too far. While it wasn't enough for women's equality, it was excessive in other policy and legislative areas. Women, patients, and children were neglected. They will likely continue to be overlooked under a Conservative government, as we are now at a standstill due to Justin Trudeau's leadership. Change for women—including single mothers, victims of violence, and patients—is unlikely under a Conservative government with a far-right stance.
"Tell me who your friends are and I will tell who you are."
That old saying sounds familiar: When someone brags about their identity, I ask them about their friends, their associates, their political values. People tend to befriend or associate with those who share their concealed, sometimes distorted values. It is nevertheless instructive to watch persons in their natural habitat, it reveals their secrets.
Evaluating election candidates based on their unconscious psyche
The left took the situation to an extreme level where many clusters of women lost their human rights to other groups. This was carefully concealed to the public. During this election it is not obvious who to choose for women. Is it possible to gain back what we lost because of Justin Trudeau? That is the issue with women's rights. Once what we have fought for is taken away it can take over 100 years to get it back now.
What might be good for one group or cluster in society can have devastating consequences to another group. This analysis will enable us to anticipate the future & understand how a particular leader might affect our economic security, healthcare access, premature morbidity & even life expectancy.
The behaviors of the radical right in the United States are equally concerning, if the Conservatives regress to this level here. If we review this video of the January 6th, 2020 savage display, it is clear this Philistine style is moving closer to our border. The depiction looks more like a group of barbarians ready to rape and pillage at all costs than anything civilized. The leader of Canada will need to be able to handle this mentality and manoeuvre it.
There are a few intriguing candidates for the Liberal leadership amidst the ongoing trade war.
Candidates:
A 37-year-old young woman, an indigenous leader from Nova Scotia, and Chrystia Freeland seem to be the most relevant candidates. I have asked for some details on Mr. Carney in light of a photo of him with the Epstein Satellite's foot soldier.
The next 4 years could change our lives as women for decades. It took us over 100 years to obtain our right to work and be single. This vote could determine our civil liberties for the future.
Comments