top of page
Search

Creating the circle of value in negotiations

Updated: Feb 26

Circle of Value in Negotiations

R.M. Boylan BSc. M.A.


"Circle of value" as a framework of mutual value


The "Circle of Value" (Ury, William) in negotiations refers to a framework that emphasizes the creation of mutual value between negotiating parties. It suggests that rather than focusing solely on dividing existing resources (a zero-sum approach), parties should work collaboratively to expand the pie and find solutions that benefit all involved. This concept encourages negotiators to explore interests, needs, and potential trade-offs to foster a more constructive and mutually expansive dialogue.


The phrase "Circle of Value" is attributed to William Ury, a prominent scholar in negotiation and conflict resolution. Ury is known for his work in the field, particularly through his book "Getting to Yes" co-authored with Roger Fisher and Bruce Patton, which emphasizes principled negotiation strategies.


Transitioning from Conflict and Bullying to a Circle of Value


To shift a bargaining situation characterized by conflict and bullying into a circle of value for negotiation, several strategies can be employed:


  • Establish a Safe Environment: Create a setting where all parties feel secure to express their needs and interests without fear of retaliation.

  • Create unexpected welcomed surprises.

  • Focus on Interests, Not Positions: Encourage parties to articulate their underlying interests rather than rigid positions, which can lead to more creative solutions.

  • Build Rapport: Engage in active listening and empathy to foster trust and understanding among parties.

  • Identify Common Goals: Highlight shared objectives that can unite parties in the negotiation process.


Trade-offs, Options, and Concessions


Understanding the concepts of trade-offs, options, and concessions is crucial in negotiations:


Trade-offs


Trade-offs involve giving up something of lesser value to gain something of greater value. They are essential in negotiations as they allow parties to reach mutually beneficial agreements.


Options


Options refer to the various possibilities available to negotiators to satisfy their interests. Generating multiple options increases the likelihood of finding a solution that works for everyone.


Concessions


Concessions are compromises made by one or both parties during negotiation. They can be strategically used to demonstrate goodwill or to facilitate progress when negotiations stall.


Strategic Use and Timing of Trade-offs, Options, and Concessions


To effectively use and time trade-offs, options, and concessions in negotiation, consider the following strategies:


  • Prepare Ahead: Identify your own priorities and potential concessions before entering negotiations to ensure you can make informed decisions.

  • Timing is Key: Introduce concessions at strategic moments, such as when you need to break a deadlock or when the other party shows interest in reaching an agreement.

  • Make Incremental Concessions: Instead of making large concessions upfront, consider smaller, incremental concessions that can lead to reciprocal concessions from the other party.

  • Encourage Joint Problem Solving: Frame trade-offs and options as collaborative solutions rather than unilateral concessions to foster a more positive negotiation atmosphere.


References


  • Ury, W., Fisher, R., & Patton, B. (2011). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. Penguin Books.

  • Fisher, R., Ury, W., & Patton, B. (1991). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. Penguin Books.

  • Lewicki, R. J., Barry, B., & Saunders, D. M. (2015). Negotiation. McGraw-Hill Education.

  • Boylan, R.M. (2006-2009). Conflicts and considerations comparing Abraham Maslow's hierarchy of needs to Jane Loevinger's model of ego development for assessing the level of development of a leader. M.A. Leadership Studies.

  • Blair, R. J. R. (2005). "Responding to the Emotions of Others: Dissociating Forms of Empathy through the Study of Antisocial Personality Disorder." Emotion, 5(1), 1-10

  • Braden, G. (2000). The Isaiah Effect. Harmony Books.

  • Brunsson, N. (2007). The consequences of decision-making. Oxford University Press.

  • Cialdini, R.B. (1993). Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion. Harpers Collins Publishers.

  • Cooper, D. F., & Chapman, C. B. (2005). Risk Management: A Project Management Approach. Taylor & Francis.

  • Covey, S. The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People. (1989). Stephen Covey.

  • "Dark Triad". Psychology Today United Kingdom. Retrieved July 6, 2022.  First published by Delroy, L. Paulhus and Kevin M. Williams in 2002

  • Deutsch, M., Coleman, P.T. (2000). The Handbook of Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice. Jossey-Bass Publishers.

  • Fisher, R., Ury, W., & Patton, B. (2011). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. Penguin Books.

  • French, J. R. P., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in Social Power (pp. 150-167). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan

    Press.

  • Hare, R. D. (1991). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R). Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.

  • Harvard Business Review. (2019). On Negotiation. Harvard Business Review Press

  • Harvard Negotiation Project https://www.pon.harvard.edu/tag/the-harvard-negotiation-project/

  • Hofstede, Geert. (2017). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing values, behaviours, institutions and organizations across nations. A MASCAT Analysis.

  • Jung, C.G. (2002). Psychology of the Unconscious. Dodd, Mead & Company.

  • Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: "Seizing" and "freezing." Psychological Review, 103(2), 263-283.

  • Lewicki, R. J., Barry, B., & Saunders, D. M. (2015). Negotiation (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

  • O’Connor, J. & Prior, R. (1995). Successful selling with NLP: Neuro-linguistic programming the way forward in the new bazaar. Harper Collins Publisher.

  • Pritchard, C.L. (2001). Risk Management: Concepts and guidance Second edition. ESI International.

  • Rackham, N. (1988). SPIN Selling. Situation, Problem, Implication, Need-Payoff. McGraw-Hill  Book Company.

  • Raiffa, H. (2002). Negotiation Analysis: The Science and Art of Collaborative Decision Making. Harvard University Press.

  • Raine, A. (2002). "Biosocial Studies of Antisocial and Violent Behavior." Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111(1), 1-10.

  • Ries, A. Trout, J. (1981). Positioning : The Battle for your mind. Werner Books.

  • Salacuse, J.W. (2008). Seven secrets for negotiating with government: How to deal with local, state, national, or foreign governments and come out ahead. AMACOM

  • Thompson, L. (2014). The Mind and Heart of the Negotiator (6th ed.). Pearson.

  • Ury, W. (1993). Getting Past No: Negotiating Your Way from Confrontation to Cooperation. New York: Bantam Books.

  • Weiss, J. (2016). Harvard Business Review Guide to. Negotiating: Take the Lead Manage Conflict Get to Yes. Harvard Business Review Press

 
 
 

Comentários


  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

© 2023 by Rose-Marie Boylan BSc. M.A.  Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page